The problem with your argument is that it only applies to the grand scheme of things. Selective pressure implies that random mutation will create variations some that are more deadly and some that are less. 1000 years from now the ones that are less deadly will still be around and the ones that are more deadly will not. That's not relevant to the argument though. If a more deadly strain wipes out mankind and thus burns its self out you will have made a valuable point but we will all be dead. Odds are that an established disease will mutate randomly and the strains that kill to many hosts will die out progressing the disease toward a milder form. The more right you are, the more dead you are. One more time the PRESSURE you talk about is us all dieing.
I was never defending the video.
I have read a hand full of papers over the past few years but of course I can't produce links to them. I hate to use wiki as a reference but it is a great source because at the bottom are lots of good references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_g...uman_variation
This area is of course still very actively being researched but all of the signs based on the various studies you mentioned are pointing toward not a whole lot of genetic diversity in humans. We are far from being a clonal population but we are not exactly genetically diverse. This is all my synthesis of papers I have read and my field is computer programming and server architecture so take it or leave it.