Do all morphs get "head wobble"?

[dr del]

Hi,

You also 'avoided' answering this.
If an animal can't control their movements, how happy can they be? It's obvious that when they strike and miss, they aren't trying to miss.
I can also post a bunch of pictures of pretty, not screwed up animals. I will post the alternatives to the last posts' spider combo morphs.
Tiger Pin
Albino Pinstripe
Axanthic Pinstripe
Banana Pin
Boom Ball
Butter Pin
Dragon Fly
OG Pin
I could go down the whole list, but that's just Pinstripe combos, about the closest to spider.
You still don't say why people can't control their desire to have a pattern morph, but somehow take care of their animals patiently (waiting longer to breed, and just in general caring about their animals as PETS. Not objects to breed and make money from).

I get that you think pinstripes look like spiders - problem is they don't. At all. In combo morphs especially.

Those are in no way, shape or form alternatives to the spider morphs mentioned. If you think they are you need your eyes examined.

In your list you might want to remove Tiger pin given the fact that the possible problem with deserts is far more serious. And keeping, incubating at lower temps has been hyped as the fix for every problem that has cropped up in ball python morphs - it has never fixed one of them yet so don't be so quick to announce that fixed. Nobody has even tried it long enough for a preliminary judgement.

Let a lone announcing a cure.

I'd also read up on bananas - there have been some major developments lately you may be unaware of.

Also the bug eye rumour in super lesser/ butters.

To be honest your specific genetic knowledge of this species is nowhere near the level you need to buy a high horse let alone pontificate from the top of it.

I get that you are passionate in your opinion that they should not be bred. But that's just it - it's an opinion and people are allowed to disagree with you. And most of the people in this thread who have actually kept the animals do.

It's pointless rechewing and re-resenting your argument. It's not that we don't understand it - we just think you are wrong. Or at least have no danged right to try and tell anyone your opinion is more valid than theirs.

You are, effectively, telling everyone they have lower moral standards than you.

Bear in mind some of them have 5-10 years of direct, eyes and hands on, experience to stack up against your precisely zero quanity of the same. Can you see how that might be contrued as an insult or at the very least extremely rude?

At the end oif the day, without actual direct understandable comunication nobody can be truly certain on the "happyness and stress" leves of any other organism.

Since that is only possible with human beings that presents a major problem. I certainly wouldn't go around asking people born with deformities or medical conditions if they would have been happier if they had never been born - and I don't recommend you try it either.

So, you have no direct knowledge or observational experience, and the other people, who have no direct knowledge but do have observational experience, disagree with you.

Does this sound like a situation that will ever be comprehensively answered to you?

Incidently - that dog in your avatar it looks like a Chihuahua?

I assume you don't think they should be bred or allowed to exist either?

You know, because of these problems?



dr del