Yes, but the comment was towards the "het" only being referenced when the gene is recessive. Any gene can be in a heterozygous arrangement, regardless of it's nature, and thus be a "het".
Yea, DUH! Sorry I didnt spell it out for the other 2 descriptions. But that doesnt make what I said at all wrong! I just didn't expand to the full amount that you wanted. I thought it was pretty obvious.
Again, why are you so damn picky today? In every thread.... damn
Last edited by littleindiangirl; 05-02-2008 at 04:00 PM.