Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 550

0 members and 550 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,200
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Threaded View

  1. #10
    BPnet Veteran Ax01's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-14-2015
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    6,183
    Thanks
    2,581
    Thanked 6,152 Times in 3,380 Posts

    Re: How leopard affect other genes

    Quote Originally Posted by Deborah View Post
    Leopard has been listed has Dominant since it first appeared however Super Leopard have been produced.
    Quote Originally Posted by JodanOrNoDan View Post
    From what I heard from Nerd, a "Super" Leopard was produced by someone, don't recall the name, but what is actually a homozygous dominant. No visual change, just produces 100% Leopards.

    Has something changed?
    Quote Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
    Graziani was the first to publicly comment on Leopard being a strict dominant type mutation with a homozygous that was not visually distinct from the heterozygous. He and I discussed it on ReptileRadio back in... I want to say early 2014.

    Kobylka has since put out a video wherein he said that he thinks there is a very subtle difference between the heterozygous and the homozygous, at least in some of the combos he has made. The trouble there is that all the animals he showed in the video were from Leo x Leo clutches and therefore only considered possibly homozygous and to the best of my knowledge neither he not anyone else has subsequently bred them out to confirm if his supposition was correct.
    i asked this awhile back: https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...pard&p=2535369 and here's the vid:



    Quote Originally Posted by Turbo Serpent View Post
    I would say its along the lines of the super enchi, super banana, super ghi where the super doesn't change the appearance but merely the offspring are 100% visuals.
    there are differences. i've noticed higher whites and softer colors overall in the Super Banana/Super CG and the Super GHI is super dark, looks to be in shed w/o the blue-ness.

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbo Serpent View Post
    I've never really noticed much of a difference between enchi and super enchi, I always thought it to be the same.
    the pattern is cleaner, bolder but the biggest difference is in the eyestripe and neck pattern.
    RIP Mamba
    ----------------

    Wicked ones now on IG & FB!6292

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ax01 For This Useful Post:

    JodanOrNoDan (07-23-2018),Turbo Serpent (07-23-2018)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1