Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 691

0 members and 691 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,194
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Threaded View

  1. #14
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Coral Glow Genetics

    Quote Originally Posted by RoyaLoveRay View Post
    So I take it that co-dominance is demonstrated by, for example, fires and leucistics, where the super fire, or leucistic, is dramatically different from the heterozygot. And so coral glows would demonstrate incomplete dominance, because the super form is just somewhat lighter. Am I correct?
    no, co dominance displays both phenotypes in their entirety. For example if a normal looks normal and the super fire looks like a BlkEL. The fire would have parts that look normal and parts that look BlkEL. no mixing, no inbetween. A true co-dom would look like a paradox of some kind.

    The closest we come in ball pythons is scaleless/scaleless head. Normals are normal, Scaleless are scaleless and the scaleless head show scaleless and normal parts. If you inspect them closely though, scaleless heads also have smaller scales sometimes which is a mix between the two, so we really can't call it co-dom truly. but its the closest we got.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to OhhWatALoser For This Useful Post:

    RoyaLoveRay (07-16-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1