Quote Originally Posted by Warren_Booth View Post
Maybe we should be trying to promote the correct terminology also. Why on earth people maintain the use of co-dominant, when we know it is incomplete dominant (a very different thing) is absurd. But sadly I see it used in books like the one from NERD, World of Ball Pythons, etc. It takes no more effort to actually state it factually.

Warren
So I take it that co-dominance is demonstrated by, for example, fires and leucistics, where the super fire, or leucistic, is dramatically different from the heterozygot. And so coral glows would demonstrate incomplete dominance, because the super form is just somewhat lighter. Am I correct?