I don't know what to tell you, snarkyness begets snarkyness. You telling me how intelligent you are is doing nothing to convince me that it is true. I am only saying that an animal that looks like a ball and has what appear to be blood python genitals could exist. My first reply very directly covered every counter point you tried to make including the one where you accused my of not understanding that in simple sexual reproduction genetic material is passed from both parents even after I said several time that is not what I am saying. So again I repeat myself if this is a case of homoploid hybrid than yes genetic information is passed from both parents equally on each chromosome location. This does not mean that the animal has to look like a mix of both parents by phenotypic expression. The animal could in fact look like a ball with blood genitalia on the surface. Yes, the animal will likely look like a mix. The point of pictures were to show the variation in phenotype, and I think you know this but it does not fit your argument. Just because an animal could exist does not mean it does exist. Do I think the animal I am describing does exist? Probably not, and therefore would be asinine to try to provide "proof" of such an animal.

Your point about chimeras being fused embryos I addressed before you even stated it, but you did not catch it so I again explained it to you. Here it is again if you had two embryos carrying the information for exact opposite phenotypical animals and they combined into a chimera then you could arrive at said conclusion. For example one animal had the phenotypical genitals of a blood and the other had the body and head of a ball they could combine to create the animal we are talking about. There is no rhyme or reason how chimeras combine as every example is different I even provided an example of a woman showing was a chimera in the basic construction I proposed. Even I admitted this is a highly complicated example and probably the least likely.

The second, more interesting proposal in my opinion, is that a snake hybrid could be a case of polyploid speciation. This theory, which is by no mean one of my own, states that two species whose DNA is not compatible can create a hybrid by adding multiple choromsomes at each location. At each location the DNA of like chromosomes is used to create cells in the offspring. This essentially creates an animal that is a mosaic genetic clone of both species. If combined correctly you could actually have an animal that is part genetic ball python and part blood python. This is by no means basic genetics so please don't waste your time trying to use basic genetics to disprove this or making a powerpoint. It is not clear to me how you do not see comments like the powerpoint one as grandstanding. I provided an article that shows polyploid hybridization occurring in fish that you can refer to.

"it is absolutely not possible for an animal like the vet described to exist and I say that with absolute certainty"
"Sure, according to the laws of probability anything is possible."
So which is it, possible or not? As I have said many time I think it is possible just highly unlikely.