Quote Originally Posted by JodanOrNoDan View Post
If someone attempts to define high quality it would upset the people that didn't meet the parameters and make those happy that did meet them. This is unavoidable. I will get into the how's later but I actually have to do some real work right now.

And no. I don't think quality only applies to appearance. There would be categories of quality. For example, an animal that does not have feeding issues is worth way more to me than one that does. It doesn't do me any good personally to have a potential breeder that takes me four years to get to size. Also one of the few complaints about balls is the way they feed. I would rather sell animals that feed well than ones that don't especially to someone new in the hobby. Also animals with attitude problems would be worth less in my book.

I think I was more assuming that certain things would be taken for granted e.g. health. Also, funny thing on attitude problems - last expo I went to they had a snake specifically labeled "a**hole corn" for half the price of their other corn snakes. I looked for personality rather than appearance, but it was still a bit tempting because it was hilarious.