Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,071

1 members and 1,070 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,142
Posts: 2,572,364
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 126

Threaded View

  1. #21
    Old enough to remember. Freakie_frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-12-2004
    Location
    221b Baker Street
    Posts
    16,636
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 3,884 Times in 2,148 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images: 107

    Re: Proof on the Spider gene. OWAL take a look

    Quote Originally Posted by Pythonfriend View Post
    after reading the first few pages and the last few pages, my opinion about the spider gene doesn't change at all.


    the mechanism is simple: heterozygous spiders are fine, and homozygous spiders don't exist because the homozygous spider is lethal.

    since the original poster didn't mention the amount of slugs, i still see two options:

    1.) Homozygous spider is very deadly, so that the embryo dies so fast that the mother snake produces a slug instead of a full-sized egg.

    2.) Homozygous spider is even more deadly, so that the fertilized zygote cannot even split once, or something prevents the egg from forming, and the mother snake doesn't even produce a slug. I consider it remotely possible that the female simply responds by producing another egg, that females just fill their bellies with eggs and stop when they have as many eggs growing as they can handle. But i think a 25% drop in fertility is more likely.
    Let me just throw this out there. slugs were never at any point fertile. Fertilization happens when the snake ovulates or shortly after. So slug never saw genetic material from either parent. The more likely idea is that infertile eggs were "Super spiders" didn't make it past the first cellular division. However because we don't truly understand reptile DNA and the associated mutations of it we wont be able to say for sure that the morphs are determined at the time of the first division or even later on. it's more likely that the mutation kicks in later in the embryo's development since its things like pigment and what not that are effected. With all of that said I've long said that it's naive to think that the only thing these mutations effect physiologically is skin pigment, We see kinking, cleft jaws, small eye's wobble's, duck bills ect ect. All of those this are changes to the anatomy of the animal.

    Still so much to learn and discover

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Freakie_frog For This Useful Post:

    C&H Exotic Morphs (07-30-2013),TJ_Burton (07-30-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1