Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 621

1 members and 620 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,108
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 153

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Lifer snakesRkewl's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-14-2009
    Location
    Milwaukie, Oregon
    Posts
    7,665
    Thanks
    2,687
    Thanked 3,036 Times in 2,147 Posts
    Images: 2
    RandyRemington

    I used to call it "recessive with co-dominant tendencies" but now with the leopards being a fully co-dominant pied mutation maybe the older pied allele is co-domain with recessive tendencies; or a subtle co-dominant if you prefer.
    A subtle incomplete dominant trait, I wholeheartedly agree.


    Genetically a het is a het is a het, I do not believe any of the traits we play with are truly recessive.
    Saying a heterozygous clown doesn't interact with the wild type gene is like saying a pastel doesn't interact with the wild type gene,
    it just isn't so.
    Both are heterozygous traits, one more visual than the other, but no different otherwise.

    Here's a simple picture, amir line yellowbelly mom with amir line yellowbelly 100% het clown.
    If het clown is "recessive" why does it act so visual?
    Last edited by snakesRkewl; 05-19-2013 at 10:14 PM.
    Jerry Robertson

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to snakesRkewl For This Useful Post:

    Aes_Sidhe (05-20-2013),Coleslaw007 (05-21-2013),satomi325 (05-19-2013),Slowcountry Balls (05-21-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1