Quote Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
I was not trying to say that the two-headed animal was absolutely a bat-eater, I do not have the knowledge to make that assessment and I gladly yield to others on that matter. All I was contending was that an Albino bat-eater could indeed occur.




What a wonderfully enlightened point of view, someone points out that you do not understand something and rather than consider that they might, just may be, correct you instead take the attitude that they are the stupid one...

You did misuse loci, your own words betray you:



Right there you say that all three types of Albino in retics fall on the same loci and then you say that they are all different/not compatible. If they all fall on the same locus then they would be compatible. Since they are not compatible they do not fall on the same locus.

There are (I believe) three separate and distinct Albino loci in retics:

Purple/White
Type II
Green



way to be wrong . . . When I say the three phases are compatible they are - Purple, white, and Lavander. You can breed a Lav x lav and you get all three phases, you can breed lax x purple and get lav and purple, lav x white and you get lav and whites, white x white all white, purple x purple all purple and purple x white = all lavs.

You can not breed Amel x Purple and get anything other than double hets, Amel being type II, and then a third type III that bob clark proved to again be distinct is not compatible with any of the rest. So recap there are 3 types of albino retics, of the type I there are 3 phases that are compatible with eachother showing different results. Each type is at a different Loci (or loucs) for each allele.

I did not go into any depth to the reply because it was not warranted. But since you want to again show your whit, allow me to clarify your own statements.