Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 614

0 members and 614 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,172
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 103

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran RoseyReps's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-07-2012
    Location
    Merritt Island, Florida
    Posts
    2,077
    Thanks
    1,300
    Thanked 1,230 Times in 689 Posts
    Images: 9

    Re: Quality of breeding stock

    Quote Originally Posted by sorraia View Post
    That could be, and I'm sure it depends on when someone is looking too. Someone looking at ads at the beginning of the season when all the babies are hatching at ones, perhaps could be looking at lesser quality, compared to someone looking at the end of the season holdbacks.

    But to confuse matters even more... how would one judge "hets"? I could just not be looking in the right places, but I haven't seen much in the way of long pedigrees (maybe parents and grandparents) complete with pictures. So without knowing what is in the animal's background, how does one judge a het? Is it worth taking the risk to buy a het, raise it up, breed it, and then possibly end up with a bunch of subpar recessive morphs? Is a newbie, or any breeder for that matter, better off just spending the extra money to buy the morph itself? Or what if it is a morph that seems so completely subjective (i.e. pied) that it doesn't really seem to matter any way?
    I ask for pictures of the parents. If they don't have that, I'm not buying the hets.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to RoseyReps For This Useful Post:

    sorraia (02-20-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1