Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 712

0 members and 712 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,201
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Threaded View

  1. #13
    BPnet Lifer Skiploder's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-03-2007
    Location
    Under a pile of wood.
    Posts
    3,580
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 3,727 Times in 1,257 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: CNN video about python ban

    Quote Originally Posted by CCfive View Post
    ARE YOU SERIOUS? Let's take away motorcycles, anything that's got a sharp edge. You can't take away people's rights because there are a few idiots abroad.
    What about the resposible, educated keepers? Where does it end?
    Hold on a sec......

    As a responsible keeper, I would have no problem applying for a permit and having my snakes chipped if need be.

    As a responsible keeper, I also realize I cannot compare a snake to a motorcycle. My irresponsibility with a motorcycle will not result in the suffering of an animal. It could result in my death and the risk of injury to someone else, but that's an ethical argument of a different type.

    I do not believe that any Tom, Richard or Harry should be able to buy a rock python. If Tom, Richard or Harry gets killed by his rock python, I could care less.

    However Tom, Richard or Harry's inability to properly care for his giant snake will result in a couple of other things - (1) pain, suffering and potentially death to the snake and (2) an assault on my ability to keep my snakes.

    No one can argue that giant constrictors should be kept by only keepers with sufficient knowledge and means to properly care for them - so why do we so quickly defend the right of ownership for any idiot who can afford the price of entry?

    After breeding snakes for a number of years and after seeing how often those animals ended up forgotten and mistreated, I do NOT support the right for any moron who can afford an animal to keep one.

    I fully support the right for responsible keepers to keep whatever they want.

    The hobby has put itself in this situation. While it's all fine and dandy to blame the burmese issue on a Hurricane and make a half-a$$ed attempt to remove human responsibility from the equation, it does not begin to explain the countless other invasive species in south Florida that have ended up there as a result of irresponsible idiots in the exotic pet trade.

    Do I support bans? No. I do support responsible pet ownership. Sadly, this hobby has proven time and time again that responsibility is not our strong suit.

    The Federal Government has just shown that they CAN take away your "rights" with regards to giant constrictors because of a hobby rife with idiots. Continue to shovel your money towards groups that are taking credit for doing something they did not.

    In the meantime I predict those efforts will get us nowhere. In fact, I predict things will get a lot worse before they get better. This is a stepping stone to more restrictions and legislation.
    Last edited by Skiploder; 01-20-2012 at 12:52 PM.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Skiploder For This Useful Post:

    decensored (01-20-2012),h&tmaster (01-20-2012),Royal Hijinx (01-20-2012),tcutting (01-20-2012),zeion97 (01-20-2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1