Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,480

1 members and 1,479 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,937
Threads: 249,129
Posts: 2,572,287
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GeorgiaD182
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Threaded View

  1. #11
    in evinco persecutus dr del's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    24,527
    Thanks
    9,263
    Thanked 6,788 Times in 4,306 Posts
    Images: 93

    Re: What do we know about breeding Bananas?

    Quote Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser View Post
    also, I would like to add for the sex link thing to be true, males would be the only ones that could be homozygous. assuming it doesn't jump over to the other chromosome

    its interesting to hear there are "mistakes" in other animals, seems to fit with what is public right now.

    would be nice to have some community statistics. Like are the few homozygous animals male and how often does a male produce a male?

    To my knowledge, no one has proven banana and coral glow compatible. Its just the genes are so damn similar, even down to the mystery males, its just suspected they are.
    Surely if it was on the Z chromosome itself then you would have a higher chance of the males in the clutch being bananas than the females?

    Isn't it more likely to be tied to the Z chromosome - and it neededn't be in the sex chromosome directly but in DNA that gets passed along with it?

    They have found satellite DNA in the more advanced snake species already and some was common to both the Z and W chromosomes and some was specific to the W chromosome.

    Say it was tied into one of the ones that was thought to be common to both but altered it slightly so it isn't.

    so while both the Z and W have A version that can be passed along they are not the same version?

    What I'm groping towards is the possibility it might be recessive in males and needs both sections of satellite DNA of the two Z chromosomes to be the altered version but, since females only have one copy anyway there is no unaltered version to over rule it and it is dominant or co-dominant.

    Or is that just horribly complicating the whole thing? It could be completely wrong in any case of course.


    dr del
    Last edited by dr del; 08-29-2011 at 05:12 PM. Reason: Clarifying it a bit. Er... I hope.
    Derek

    7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1