» Site Navigation
1 members and 574 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,189
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
|
-
Re: The Blue-Eyed Leucistic Ball Python
 Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser
I was told a lesser x lesser breeding will produce the most stunning BEL you can get, but thats always going to be a debate.
Just a bit of simple symantics, but I think the word stunning is an opinion. I myself believe that the Super Mojave is more stunning than the Super Lesser. However, I will agree that the Super Lesser is the cleanest BEL.
 Originally Posted by PythonWallace
You can say whatever you want, but a mojo x mojo makes leucistics. You can call them skidmarks if you want, but that doesn't change the fact that they are lucies.
Phantom x phantom and phantom x mojave do not make lucies. You can call them "dirty lucies" if you want, but by definition, if it has a pattern and xanthiphore and melanin, it cannot be a lucy. A patternless white snake, whether it has a "dirty" head or not, is leucistic.
Jake,
Just my opinion on the matter, but I thought I would interject my understanding of Leucism. If I understand the condition correctly, it is actually caused by a lack of, or turned off chromatophores. Chromatophores are the cells in the skin that are responsible for displaying pigment. If they are absent or turned off, then the skin does not hold pigment. That would mean that the pigments are present in the animal, but the skin does not hold them. Therefore, a Leucy would actually have xanthriphores, melanin, and any other pigments that may be acting in Ball Pythons.
Just my .02,
Last edited by muddoc; 06-04-2009 at 10:12 AM.
Reason: formatting
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|