Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 687

2 members and 685 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,073
Threads: 249,220
Posts: 2,572,813
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, LeonoraOrdonez5
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Threaded View

  1. #16
    Registered User Pezz's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-20-2017
    Posts
    426
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 196 Times in 152 Posts

    Re: Jeffree ate his first rat!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Zincubus View Post
    You trust Google 100% ?

    Pretty sure I was looking at a scientific paper where they showed their was virtually difference between mice and rats nutritionally. Just rats are more convenient for larger meals /snakes .
    They didn't involve underdeveloped pinkies or hoppers ..


    I'll try and find it online somehow - as I always presumed rats were far better ...


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Rats are around 56% protein and 32% fat and 12% "ash weight" mice are around 46% protein and 38% fat with 16 percent ash weight. As for minerals and vitamins virtually no difference. In any case it's not that big of a difference.

    Sent from my LG-M151 using Tapatalk

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Pezz For This Useful Post:

    omglolchrisss (10-31-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1