Hi,

Not wrong - just redundant and a year or so late.

If you want to use the animal care argument then start working for a ban on cats and dogs - far more of them feature in reports of animal abuse after all.

They also kill far more wildlife and therefore have a greater negative impact on the environment than the snakes in the everglades. They even have a much greater negative impact in the everglades.

Which, for the record, is an artifically created environment that has been repeatedly modified and redefined by humans for more generations than I would like to count.

These same humans have now arbitrarily chosen a point in time and called it "natural" and seek to restore the environment to that state. Despite the fact there is no such thing as a stable or static state in nature.

To be blunt there isn't a single part of the argument for this legislation that isn't absurd with even the most cursory glance.


dr del