» Site Navigation
0 members and 1,220 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,216
Threads: 248,623
Posts: 2,569,254
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Super Champagne - post shed
The Super Champagne shed today and here's an updated picture. She is pretty neat, kind of translucent, if you look closely you can see veins, etc. I think that's giving her the pinkish look. It's difficult to get a good picture as some came out more yellow, or too pink. I think this picture shows her look the best.
She is very shy and constantly tucking her head in. Definitely not 100% but she seems much stronger now.
-
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Dave Green For This Useful Post:
- + Show/Hide list of the thanked
-
AlexisFitzy (01-01-2015),ball-nut (07-01-2012),Bellatrix_LeSnake (06-24-2012),CLSpider (06-21-2012),Exotic Ectotherms (06-20-2012),heathers*bps (06-21-2012),interloc (06-21-2012),loonunit (06-21-2012),meowmeowkazoo (06-25-2012),Pinoy Pythons (06-21-2012),Spookitie (06-29-2012),West Coast Jungle (06-28-2012),Wicked Constrictors (07-01-2012)
-
BPnet Veteran
Wow she's hot. So is she gonna stay that pink? Although, she is the first so only time will tell.
-
-
She is smocking, can't wait to see her with some size
-
-
BPnet Veteran
She looks awesome! Congrats! Keep us posted as she progress.
Ball Pythons are like Pokémon. Gotta Catch 'Em All!
-
-
Registered User
Re: Super Champagne - post shed
What a beautiful animal!! How did you produce something like that?? I'm still new to this whole thing. I thought the champagne gene was a dominant gene and you could not make a 'super' version of a dominant gene. For example, I've never heard of a 'super spider'. Maybe one exists, but like I said, I'm still trying to figure out the whole genetic thing.
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Super Champagne - post shed
Originally Posted by Funke910
What a beautiful animal!! How did you produce something like that?? I'm still new to this whole thing. I thought the champagne gene was a dominant gene and you could not make a 'super' version of a dominant gene. For example, I've never heard of a 'super spider'. Maybe one exists, but like I said, I'm still trying to figure out the whole genetic thing.
Well because there is a super, it is actually a co-dominant. It was known to not be recessive, but because there hadn't been a super it was deemed dominant. Now, it is proven co-dominant.
-
-
That snake is HOT!!!
-
-
Registered User
-
-
Jason want, Jason hope color stay forever.
Reptiles
0.0.1 - Rhacodactylus Ciliatus, Cheerio
Mammals
1.1 - Canis Lupus Familiaris, Little Man & Molly
-
-
Man, I can't wait to see her with a few hundred more grams on her! I already want a BEL, a super black pastel and now I need a super champagne to have an all pink snake to go with my all white and all black snakes!
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
1.0 Spider "Charlie"
1.1 Normal "Precious" "Chumley"
0.1 Pastel "Sweet Dee"
1.1 Mojave "Stewie" "Little Bit"
0.1 Lesser "Sally"
1.0 Pied "Jack"
1.0 Nile Monitor "Superman"
0.1 Bearded Dragons "Snookie"
0.0.1 Sulcuta Tortoise "Kenny Powers"
1.0 Chocolate lab "Dante"
1.0 Now snake obsessed boyfriend
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|