Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 577

1 members and 576 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,200
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 72

Threaded View

  1. #17
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    03-08-2008
    Posts
    358
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 65 Times in 62 Posts

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    Keep in mind folks, that "Non-native wildlife" includes a lot more than the reptiles we love - near as I can see, that definition would include every single non-domesticated animal. By its strictest definition, that could be just about every single non-native species except cats, dogs and traditional livestock.

    That's parakeets.

    Ferrets.

    Canaries.

    Hamsters.

    Parrots.

    Guinea pigs.

    Tropical fish, from neon tetras to snakeheads. Tilapia? Who's writing the definitions? P.E.T.A.? Hope you like tofu.

    The upside is - we're not quite alone here - though the bird hobby has already lost most of its importing, they still rely on captive breeding and transportation across State lines. So does the tropical fish industry. (And compare the size of the fish section with the size of the reptile section at your local pet shop.) Of course, there'll be exceptions made for laboratory research - which H.S.U.S. and P.E.T.A. activists can then concentrate their efforts on - and release all those animals into the environment.

    My (fairly cynical) $.02 - and I may owe you change.

    ~Bruce

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BrucenBruce For This Useful Post:

    sweety314 (02-08-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1