» Site Navigation
4 members and 866 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,146
Posts: 2,572,381
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: Genetic "flaws" associated with various morphs?
 Originally Posted by Albey
I am sorry but I don’t believe you, and I disagree with you whole-heartedly. Show me these pictures or direct me to the animals that you say look like that.
I'm sorry, but you don't have to believe me, and disagreements make the world go around, whole-heartedly, and other wise.
Since you asked:
http://www.ralphdavisreptiles.com/bi...pythons_07.asp
Clutch Number 2...last pic on the right. You telling me this is a visual illusion?
I'm a Targeteer...I interpret images for a living...that is no illusion. Using the picture on the far left in that row I did a simple photo scale reciprical measurement. Measuring the width of the Super's nose with those of the two Cinny's shows that the Super's nose is, on average, 3.4mm wider at the widest part than the Cinny's at the widest part. In addition, using indirect ratio measurement, the Super's nose is .9mm taller than the two Cinny's on average. The combination of these two differences in width and height are what give it the duckbill look....not an illusion, a tweeked BP.
And before you ask, I checked my measurments against 3 other pictures showing multiple BP's in the same frame (constant photo scale) and all their measurements came out to within .2mm of eachother...well with in standard deviation error perimeters.
Thomas "Slim" Whitman
Never Met A Ball Python I Didn't Like 
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|