Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 780

0 members and 780 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,177
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 100

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Steel Magnolia rabernet's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-12-2005
    Location
    In the Nest
    Posts
    29,196
    Thanks
    2,845
    Thanked 5,584 Times in 3,092 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images: 46

    Re: Genetic "flaws" associated with various morphs?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucas339 View Post
    I see where you are coming from with this. these lines need to be cleaned up a bit so to speak. there are carmels out there without kinks and spiders that don't show spinning or wobbels as much as others. i feel extra care should go into breeding these morphs to keep these defects from happening. less sibXsib breeding with these.
    Just as an FYI - rarely does anyone breed spider siblings together - in fact, being classified (thus far) as a dominant trait, it's one of the most out-crossed morphs. To make more spiders, you only need to breed to normals.

    Just as a low white pied can throw high white and vice versa, spiders with very minimal wobblers can throw trainwrecks, and trainwrecks can throw low wobblers.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to rabernet For This Useful Post:

    771subliminal (12-23-2008)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1