Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 599

0 members and 599 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,915
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,197
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KBFalconer
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: 1.0 2.0 .1

  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran littleindiangirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-31-2007
    Posts
    8,193
    Thanks
    637
    Thanked 794 Times in 487 Posts
    Images: 25

    Re: 1.0 2.0 .1

    Quote Originally Posted by Spaniard View Post
    1.2.3

    Male.Female.Unknown
    So the number above would mean 1 female, 2 males, and 3 snakes of unknown sex
    LOL, Rich you had it right the first time, then you flipped her around!

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran Spaniard's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-02-2006
    Location
    Farmingdale, Long Island
    Posts
    4,405
    Thanks
    355
    Thanked 580 Times in 487 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: 1.0 2.0 .1

    Hehe...I know, when I was writing the second example I spoke it out loud the right way and wrote it the wrong way. The brain does funny things sometimes
    ~*Rich
    1.0 100% Het Albino
    1.3 Normal
    1.0 Spider
    0.1 Mojave
    1.0 Pastel 100% Het Goldfinger
    0.1 Pastel 66% Het Goldfinger
    0.1 Pastel PH Goldfinger


  3. #13
    Registered User kid_mustango02's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-10-2007
    Location
    Little Rock, AR
    Posts
    138
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
    Images: 25

    Re: 1.0 2.0 .1

    Heh, now you gotta flip all the numbers around in your sig
    Too many snakes to be declared "sane" as far as my friends are concerned....

  4. #14
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    09-14-2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    3,250
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 703 Times in 538 Posts

    Re: 1.0 2.0 .1

    What drives me crazy is when there is a list of names in someone's signature, but they aren't in the right order for the sexes.

    Example:
    1.2 normals (Sally, Tom, Mary)

    Since males are listed first in the decimal listing... shouldn't Tom's name come first too? Or is Sally the male? LOL!

    This hurts my head less:
    1.2 normals (Tom, Sally, Mary)
    Casey

  5. #15
    BPnet Veteran sg1trogdor's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-21-2007
    Location
    los angeles california
    Posts
    2,505
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 225 Times in 191 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: 1.0 2.0 .1

    THe names dont really have to coincide with the numbers. . After all its your sig.
    Chris http://dragcave.net/user/sg1trogdor
    Time for some until I see

  6. #16
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    09-14-2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    3,250
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 703 Times in 538 Posts

    Re: 1.0 2.0 .1

    Quote Originally Posted by sg1trogdor View Post
    THe names dont really have to coincide with the numbers. . After all its your sig.
    Yeah, I know they don't HAVE to. I just said it makes my head hurt less when they do!
    Casey

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1