Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 722

1 members and 721 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,191, 03-09-2025 at 12:17 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,880
Threads: 249,079
Posts: 2,572,005
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, pickledratinajar
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 60
  1. #31
    No One of Consequence wilomn's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-18-2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Thanks
    123
    Thanked 2,795 Times in 1,171 Posts
    Images: 109

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Quote Originally Posted by Tosha_Mc View Post
    when their coloration is most likely due to being gravid - and then the "oddballs" that are hatched are almost as likely a result of stress on either mom or the egg and are not in fact genetic. How few of these oddballs actually prove out?
    Is this pure speculation and conjecture or do you have any facts to base this statement on? I've never heard it before.
    I may not be very smart, but what if I am?
    Stinky says, "Women should be obscene but not heard." Stinky is one smart man.
    www.humanewatch.org

  2. #32
    BPnet Veteran Tosha_Mc's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-20-2008
    Posts
    475
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 27 Times in 18 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Quote Originally Posted by wilomn View Post
    Is this pure speculation and conjecture or do you have any facts to base this statement on? I've never heard it before.
    My math isn't the best but they've been importing WC gravids for how many decades and how many proven morphs have come from WC gravids?
    Tosha

    The web page: JET Pythons
    The blog: http://jetpythons.blogspot.com/

  3. #33
    No One of Consequence wilomn's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-18-2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Thanks
    123
    Thanked 2,795 Times in 1,171 Posts
    Images: 109

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Quote Originally Posted by Tosha_Mc View Post
    My math isn't the best but they've been importing WC gravids for how many decades and how many proven morphs have come from WC gravids?
    My question is this. Do you have any proof that mothers look different when gravid as imports and that they are therefore having babies that look like things/morphs they are not? That they appear one way but are in fact actually something else, morph wise, entirely?

    It seems that you are saying that gravid mothers look one way when imported and that their babies do as well.

    IF this is not what you meant to say, what did you mean to say?
    I may not be very smart, but what if I am?
    Stinky says, "Women should be obscene but not heard." Stinky is one smart man.
    www.humanewatch.org

  4. #34
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    02-06-2006
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    1,178
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked 69 Times in 50 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Quote Originally Posted by wilomn View Post
    Is this pure speculation and conjecture or do you have any facts to base this statement on? I've never heard it before.
    you've never heard of a ball python's genetics being misrepresented? i'm pretty sure the previous poster was using those examples to try to get his point across. whether those actual examples happend or not, examples like that happen all the time.

  5. #35
    No One of Consequence wilomn's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-18-2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Thanks
    123
    Thanked 2,795 Times in 1,171 Posts
    Images: 109

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Quote Originally Posted by bigballs View Post
    you've never heard of a ball python's genetics being misrepresented? i'm pretty sure the previous poster was using those examples to try to get his point across. whether those actual examples happend or not, examples like that happen all the time.
    Why don't we let HER answer the question? ASSuming does what and to whom?

    I'm just curious as to what SHE meant to say. It sure seemed she was talking scientific fact about snakes changing post egglaying and import. I simply have never heard of such a thing.

    A lightening or darkening, sure. But a morph change? That one is new to me.
    I may not be very smart, but what if I am?
    Stinky says, "Women should be obscene but not heard." Stinky is one smart man.
    www.humanewatch.org

  6. #36
    BPnet Veteran Brimstone111888's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-19-2007
    Location
    Fort Myers, Florida
    Posts
    905
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Quote Originally Posted by Tosha_Mc View Post
    My major problem is that these animals get over here - they are completely misrepresented and sold as ghosts, desert ghosts, axanthics, etc. when their coloration is most likely due to being gravid - and then the "oddballs" that are hatched are almost as likely a result of stress on either mom or the egg and are not in fact genetic. How few of these oddballs actually prove out?

    Anyway - it's economics for a poor country - and if we didn't buy them as pets they would end up as food. If the wild populations die out - there are plenty of unwanted normals in the US we can send back for re population.
    Quote Originally Posted by wilomn View Post
    Is this pure speculation and conjecture or do you have any facts to base this statement on? I've never heard it before.

    Whoa whoa whoa. Are you saying stress changes the coloring of the mother and the eggs? Sounds like PURE speculation, and a bit ridiculous.

    From what I've seen most imports have a little bit of a different look to them, but thats because they are breeding out in the wild and the captive ones are being selectivly bred. Overall it leads to subtle differences.

  7. #37
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    02-06-2006
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    1,178
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked 69 Times in 50 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Quote Originally Posted by wilomn View Post
    Why don't we let HER answer the question? ASSuming does what and to whom?

    I'm just curious as to what SHE meant to say. It sure seemed she was talking scientific fact about snakes changing post egglaying and import. I simply have never heard of such a thing.

    A lightening or darkening, sure. But a morph change? That one is new to me.
    whoa... why don't i just stop posting and cancel my bp.net account right away. please members of the bp.net community forgive me for ever deciding to post in a thread!

    a lightening or darkening can be misrepresented as a hypomelaninstic or hypermelanistic. remember this is just an example im using here. you and i may be able to tell the difference between a genetic trait and a misrepresentation but to the person that can't then the lighter or darker bp has just been successfully misrepresented as a morph that it is not.

    now you see the actual genetics have not changed but the morph has due to misrepresentation. im glad i could teach you something new!

  8. #38
    BPnet Veteran Tosha_Mc's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-20-2008
    Posts
    475
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 27 Times in 18 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Let me rephrase because apparently some people are not understanding what I'd meant to get across.

    We do know that stress can change a snakes color - we know that being gravid hormones, etc. can change a snakes color - we know that often times gravid females whether imported or cb change color to have an axanthic or ghostly appearance - but prior to or after laying their eggs return to normal - and this is not a genetic condition - however we see the ads in the classifieds that these wc females are these morphs - most likely they are not anything other than normal girls and will return to their normal looking colors after laying their eggs.

    We also know that stress (in various forms) on the mother during her "pregnancy" and/or stress on the egg can cause anomalies in what would otherwise be a normal hatchling. That is to say - even tho these WC hatchlings, captive hatch hatchlings or even some oddball captive bred hatchlings look odd different etc. - they are really genetically just normals until proven otherwise.

    Now with as many oddballs that we see - very few actually turn out to be genetic. It's just something to keep in mind and think about before ploping down $2K on a gravid "desert ghost".
    Tosha

    The web page: JET Pythons
    The blog: http://jetpythons.blogspot.com/

  9. #39
    BPnet Veteran PythonWallace's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-26-2007
    Location
    Woodridge, IL
    Posts
    2,967
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 346 Times in 210 Posts
    Images: 23

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    Quote Originally Posted by Tosha_Mc View Post
    Let me rephrase because apparently some people are not understanding what I'd meant to get across.

    We do know that stress can change a snakes color - we know that being gravid hormones, etc. can change a snakes color - we know that often times gravid females whether imported or cb change color to have an axanthic or ghostly appearance - but prior to or after laying their eggs return to normal - and this is not a genetic condition - however we see the ads in the classifieds that these wc females are these morphs - most likely they are not anything other than normal girls and will return to their normal looking colors after laying their eggs.

    We also know that stress (in various forms) on the mother during her "pregnancy" and/or stress on the egg can cause anomalies in what would otherwise be a normal hatchling. That is to say - even tho these WC hatchlings, captive hatch hatchlings or even some oddball captive bred hatchlings look odd different etc. - they are really genetically just normals until proven otherwise.

    Now with as many oddballs that we see - very few actually turn out to be genetic. It's just something to keep in mind and think about before ploping down $2K on a gravid "desert ghost".
    That can be true, but I've never seen those kind of prices that you're talking about ($2k). That specific add said all of the gravid females are $125 - $250 for the largest girls. Even the "oddballs I've seen for sale have said things lie "oddball red Axanthic type" or whatever, but I don't remember seeing any of these for more than $600. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, just that I haven't seen it happen, and it certainly isn't happening in the ad this thread is talking about.
    What are these mojavas I keep hearing so much about?

    J. W. Exotics

    Reptile Incubators

  10. #40
    BPnet Veteran PythonWallace's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-26-2007
    Location
    Woodridge, IL
    Posts
    2,967
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 346 Times in 210 Posts
    Images: 23

    Re: More mud in the debate over WC Gravids

    I also don't think anyone would by a gravid wild caught female for anywhere near $2k without the snake looking like it was a really cool morph, but that person spending that kind of money would also know the risk that it isn't genetic. If it's advertised as WC, nobody can know for sure. Some people have spent $20,000 - $50,000 on a WC oddball hatchling that ended up proving out as normal. That's risk vs. the possibility of a huge reward.
    What are these mojavas I keep hearing so much about?

    J. W. Exotics

    Reptile Incubators

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1