im not buying in to the so called "markers" theory so for me personaly it is a normal....a very nice normal. until she is bred to with a pied of course. ive seen a lot of royals with the so-called het pied marker go on to produce nothing visible. i would however breed her to a pied over any other normal female without the belly markings. it would bug me if i didnt as there is always that chance.
The Artist Formerly Known As VeeDubZ
^^^Working on the Morph Guide Take a Look^^^
3.9 BP's
2.1 Lemon Pastels
im not buying in to the so called "markers" theory so for me personaly it is a normal....a very nice normal. until she is bred to with a pied of course. ive seen a lot of royals with the so-called het pied marker go on to produce nothing visible. i would however breed her to a pied over any other normal female without the belly markings. it would bug me if i didnt as there is always that chance.
i wouldnt call it that if i didnt know the parentage as it would get a bit confusing
You need to read the entire post, as John states that he produced this animal from his Het Pied male. That makes it a 50% Possible Het. Pied, no matter what angle you look at it from.
So I read through the whole post and no one has mentioned what the Three markers are.
there are some of us out here that are still learning. What are the three markers as I have one that is 66% Pos Het Pied. I will start a new thread with pics when I get home.
Originally Posted by BChambers
Reply With Quote
there are some of us out here that are still learning. What are the three markers as I have one that is 66% Pos Het Pied. I will start a new thread with pics when I get home.