Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,871

1 members and 1,870 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,191, 03-09-2025 at 12:17 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,876
Threads: 249,065
Posts: 2,571,961
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, TreySongz
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Threaded View

  1. #2
    BPnet Senior Member Lord Sorril's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-05-2018
    Location
    Massachusetts - USA
    Posts
    1,858
    Thanks
    827
    Thanked 4,019 Times in 1,468 Posts
    Images: 120

    Re: A hypothetical breeding question

    Yes, this is an interesting problem.

    66% is the raw statistical probability of a Het assuming basic genetic assortment and no additional data.

    As soon as you produce a clutch: that 66% value *technically* should be adjusted based on statistical results.
    If you produce no Homozygous (HO) offspring in a 66% Het vs. HO mating: then that Het probability percentage goes *downward* proportionally to the number of non-HO offspring produced--Likewise a single HO offspring adjusts the value to a proven 100%.

    In addition, you may have a 66% Het that seemingly produces no proven offspring from one cross, but, there are several potential factors that could have prevented the Homozygous form from being viable (with no noticeable evidence). If you cross it to a different specimen then you may have very different results.

    Anyhow, my
    Last edited by Lord Sorril; 01-17-2025 at 08:52 PM.
    *.* TNTC

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Lord Sorril For This Useful Post:

    Homebody (01-18-2025)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1