Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 722

0 members and 722 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Threaded View

  1. #5
    BPnet Veteran Godzilla78's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-18-2016
    Location
    Asheville, NC, USA
    Posts
    2,382
    Thanks
    3,260
    Thanked 2,106 Times in 1,195 Posts
    Interesting topic.
    I know a high end breeder that produced/discovered a new morph. The morph proved to be codominant with a super form. This breeder bred the best superforms together for several years, and now claims that this new line-breed of the super morphs is a "new Morph".
    The breeder and morph will remain unnamed, but I find it difficult to accept this conclusion without harder evidence. Does this line-breeder of a super-form codominant gene morphs actually result in a new genetic mutation, and an entirely new morph? Basically, this breeder is claiming that the superform breedings resulted in a new codominant mutation, so that the new breed now has a super form of its own!!!? A super form of a super form so to speak. I came really close to investing in his project, but due to skepticism and limited budget on my part, I have so far held back. Part of me believes that the "new morph" is just nice examples of the super form of the base morph, but with a 'new name' to increase the pricetag...
    Last edited by Godzilla78; 02-07-2019 at 03:11 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1