Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 561

2 members and 559 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,172
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Threaded View

  1. #7
    BPnet Lifer Bogertophis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-28-2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    20,799
    Thanks
    29,374
    Thanked 20,572 Times in 12,293 Posts

    Re: Improvements for the Beep

    Quote Originally Posted by craigafrechette View Post
    ...
    - If you're relying on a thermometer and not using a temp gun you're not getting surface temps, so that unregulated UTH could be a LOT hotter on the surface. If 88 was ambient, that surface temp was likely well over 100....
    Well, you're making an assumption that the thermometer is reading ambient temperatures, & you are probably right, but it IS possible to read surface temperatures
    with a thermometer...some of us that have been around a while have done so for years, by laying a thermometer right over the UTH & then waiting a while for the
    accurate reading. I honestly do NOT like temp. guns...I bought a decent one & used it for a while, but it gave flaky readings that had to be taken multiple times...so
    which one is the REAL one, if you know what I mean? Anyway, I sold my temp. gun & don't miss it one bit...I have a box of mercury thermometers that work just fine.

    Note, I'm not trying to change anyone's methods here, just giving a caution about jumping to the wrong conclusions. You ARE correct that UTH must be regulated...

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Bogertophis For This Useful Post:

    Craiga 01453 (09-20-2018)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1