Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,159

1 members and 1,158 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,141
Posts: 2,572,340
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Threaded View

  1. #14
    BPnet Royalty John1982's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-13-2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,009
    Thanks
    2,496
    Thanked 2,962 Times in 1,669 Posts

    Re: Comparable or no?

    Speaking specifically about royals, until there is actual evidence to back one method vs another, I'll try to remain neutral and openminded. There are many who use racks because they genuinely believe their snakes are healthier(easier to keep sanitary) and happier(agoraphobic argument is the most common) as a result. While I'm not opposed to either housing choice, I never really understood the holier than thou attitude of people keeping snakes in a 48 inch enclosure versus a 33 inch tub. Some of the natural setups are undeniably beautiful, yes, but what benefit is that for the snake? Neither are anywhere close a wild setting, specifically in regards to spatial limitations, so who can really argue that the royal is better off in one vs the other? How are you measuring the happiness and wellbeing of the snake besides superimposing your own feelings over them?

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to John1982 For This Useful Post:

    zina10 (09-20-2017),Zincubus (09-20-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1