Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 653

0 members and 653 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,108
Posts: 2,572,139
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Threaded View

  1. #23
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 428 Times in 263 Posts
    Images: 21

    Re: Spider x Spider results

    Watched the video. IMO, just talking is a poor way to present genetics material. Adding pictures would be helpful. Markus Jayne has similar material in text on his web page. Adding pictures there would also be helpful but less helpful than when just using voice. See http://ballpython.ca/genetics-101/

    For codominance vs. incomplete dominance, there is a technical difference in genetics texts, but the two are easy to confuse in practice. Actually, as we herpers use the term "codominance", it means something like "could be technically incomplete dominance or technically codominance, but I don't know which."

    Kevin did not give any evidence to support the claim that spider is a dominant gene. So I will continue classifying it as not recessive, possibly (probably?) lethal when there are two spider genes in the gene pair.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to paulh For This Useful Post:

    Albert Clark (09-11-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1