Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 781

1 members and 780 guests
Lord Sorril,
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Search Forums

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,908
Threads: 249,108
Posts: 2,572,131
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Threaded View

  1. 04-18-2017, 08:33 PM #11
    Oxylepy
    Oxylepy is offline
    BPnet Veteran Oxylepy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-25-2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,383
    Thanks
    362
    Thanked 573 Times in 434 Posts
    This proposal is already being noticed by a large number of pet owners across the nation. At the present time opposing the proposed section 62 titled "Keeping of animals" is the only way to avoid nation wide negative public relations.
    Last edited by Oxylepy; 04-18-2017 at 08:34 PM.
    Ball Pythons 1.1 Lesser, Pastel
    1.0 Lesser Pastel, 0.0.7 mixed babies
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1