There is a popular breeder that kinda famous for making up existing morphs......
I think besides lesser/butter and mystic/phantom. I have a reason for keeping the rest separate. Morphs being similar doesn't make them the same.
I also feel the opposite of lines, i think they are a problem. Ian G BP were famous for their dark coloring but a generation or 2 of out crossing could easily make a muddy black pastel and yet it is still considered Ian G. Look at how many lemon pastels are barely recognizable as pastels at all. If people would stop focusing on the marketing name and look at the animal, we might have more of the higher quality animals we strive for. If your line is that much better than the rest it shouldn't need a name, the animal should speak for itself.
Reply With Quote