DNA, Chromosomes and Chimera talk

[asplundii]

...And yet people have survived jumping out of plains so it not impossible just highly unlikely. This is a perfect example of a straw man argument.

And here I was talking about a very specific set of conditions that had not one thing to do with airplanes and you bring up airplanes… So strawman right back at you.

My argument is that you could have something that looks like a ball python on the outside and has reproductive organs that appear to be from a blood python. I provided the way it could be possible just by phenotypic expression, the more likely option, and by actual genetic make up.

You provided a cherry-picked bad picture as proof and even in that bad picture you can see the animal is not a pure ball. And if you have ever had hands on a ball/blood hybrid there is simply no way you could confuse it as being a ball.

As for the genetic make-up… You have not provided anything close to proof. Proof would be an actual documented genetic mechanism. All you have provided is rampant speculation built off of a topic in genetics that most people in the hobby do not understand nearly as well as they would like to think they do.

The second is a bit of a stretch, but not impossible. I will leave it you to try to specifically refute them.

I already did refute them. Twice. You have pointedly ignored my refutations.

No you did not explain every minute detail

I said that I could I did not say that I had.

because that would be insanely tedius.

Yes, it will be tedious since it appears that I am going to have to create a full set of PowerPoint slides so I can convert them into .jpg thereby allowing me to deliver a full on lecture about what is basic genetics and cell biology.

Secondly no you can not as not every thing about genetic inheritance is fully understood, by the human race at least.

No, everything about genetic inheritance is not fully known. But the bare basics are and this is a bare basics situation.

Maybe you are some sort of omnicent being, then I will eat my words.

Ahhh... Snark. I enjoy snark (ad hominem attack much??)

No, I am not omniscient. However, between the two of us I would posit that there is the distinct probability that I just might know a little bit more about genetics than you do…

Did you come here to make grandstands or talk about genetics?

I am talking genetics, but if you want to accuse me of grandstanding (hey look, another ad hominem attack) rather than actually refuting the legitimate genetics I have put forth then please, go right ahead.

If I have the free time and the boredom I will make up the slide I mentioned above and then I will slip into full on lecture mode. However, right now I have finished eating lunch so I have other duties to attend to