Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,332

1 members and 1,331 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,917
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,203
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Necbov
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Threaded View

  1. #14
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 428 Times in 263 Posts
    Images: 21

    Re: The UVA/UVB Debate (again...)

    I'm late to this discussion. Better late than never, though.

    One possibility is that the UV bulb used in the study did not produce sufficient light of the proper wave lengths to affect the snakes blood vitamin levels. A stronger light or longer exposure might. Have to check that paper and see how strong the artificial light is compared to sunlight.

    It would be nice to get the blood levels from snakes in the wild. Who knows how the levels differ between wild snakes and captives.

    A natural way to supplement the snakes' vitamin D intake would be to expose live or freshly killed rodents to raw sunlight before feeding them to the snakes. We know that rodents use sunlight to produce D3.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to paulh For This Useful Post:

    O'Mathghamhna (07-01-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1