Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,015

0 members and 1,015 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,067
Threads: 249,217
Posts: 2,572,782
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Inky Clouds
Results 1 to 10 of 48

Thread: Thermostat rant

Threaded View

  1. #20
    BPnet Veteran Jabberwocky Dragons's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-17-2012
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    404
    Thanks
    69
    Thanked 276 Times in 158 Posts
    Images: 9

    Re: Thermostat rant

    Quote Originally Posted by Reinz View Post
    Maybe I'm over thinking this or just too dense to understand the reasoning.

    I use Herpstat 2's. After reading the thread Eric provided, it seems that you are just gambling on which unit will fail first, or conversely, which one you have MORE confidence in. It seems that if your secondary fails it may shut everything down. Thus, where's the back up to the backup?

    Unless someone can dumb it down to me I see no reason for a back up to a Herpstat but maybe for other brands.

    Sure, here's it simplified. Your secondary (on/off) thermostat should always be on. If your primary fails in the "on" position, your secondary will turn power off to both. Gambling or confidence doesn't factor in here.

    If the secondary fails in the "on" position, it doesn't matter because it's not providing heat to anything. It will simply allow your primary to continue functioning as normal. Your secondary should always be on anyways. Herpstat is reliable but should still be backed up. Losing a clutch of eggs or a rack of snakes in not a fun experience, especially when a fool-proof method of prevention is so easy and relatively inexpensive.


    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Alan View Post
    There's a much greater risk when a thermostat fails in the on position than the off position. Herpstats are designed to fail in the off position. Cheaper stats typically fail in the on position. If the secondary fails in the typical manner here, the worst it would be doing would be supplying power to the primary Herpstat.

    This kind of backup is designed to work if the primary were to fail in the on position. Since this is so unlikely with a quality stat like the Herpstats, I personally don't see much reason to back a Herpstat up. Would it hurt? No. Is it overkill? Possibly.

    From Spyder Robotics: http://www.spyderrobotics.com/home/s...edocument.html.
    It's been a long day so I may not be reading correctly. What I'm taking away from your link though is that Spyder Robotics says that their Herpstats are inherently designed to fail in the "on" position (per the Triac component). They have taken steps to help prevent this in the higher end models but the default failure is still the on position regardless. They also give this prominent warning:

    Also keep in mind that even with the highest quality components ALL electronics have the possibility of failure.
    It then goes on to recommend backing Herpstats up with a secondary on/off.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Jabberwocky Dragons For This Useful Post:

    Reinz (01-03-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1