Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 571

2 members and 569 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,179
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Threaded View

  1. #25
    Telling it like it is! Stewart_Reptiles's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-28-2006
    Posts
    24,845
    Thanks
    6,116
    Thanked 20,811 Times in 9,584 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images: 6

    Re: Breeding Normals..is it a bad thing?

    Quote Originally Posted by SCWood View Post
    I think that, what they mean, is that breeding normal to normal is not ideal because it's harder to place the babies. Whereas, I could breed my normal female to my silver streak male and get NO normals therefore easier placement lol
    Not really easier single genes especially males are hard to place, Pastels are basically the new normal.

    There are a lot of things to consider, not everyone that breeds will actually make a return that will allow them that break even and have a collection that pays for itself, at least not in the first year or so and maybe never especially with lower single gene mutations.......that's the reality if you want it to make a return allowing you to care for your collection you will have to be smart about it and plan it like a small business.
    Last edited by Stewart_Reptiles; 10-20-2015 at 06:05 PM.
    Deborah Stewart


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1