Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,810

1 members and 1,809 guests
Most users ever online was 54,199, 06-29-2026 at 02:43 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,104
Threads: 249,252
Posts: 2,572,975
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GarlandFbj
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Threaded View

  1. #23
    BPnet Senior Member JoshSloane's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-16-2015
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,373
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 567 Times in 399 Posts
    Images: 5
    And round and round we go. I never once said that you shouldn't measure temps or humidity. Obviously you need to use the tools that you have to remain within acceptable parameters. I was merely responding to the OP's actual question regarding fluctuations in INCREASED humidity that was TEMPORARY.

    In a perfect world Jesus would descend from the heavens, we would all hold hands, sing kumbaya and dance in a circle around our snake enclosures, and temps and humidity would remain static and perfect.

    Until this happens, all we can do is do our diligence to keep enclosure conditions as close as possible to ideal, and not have a heart attack when minor and temporary fluctuations occur.

    And last but not least, Neanderthals did not drag their knuckles, nor were they of diminished intelligence as you yourself have suggested. They walked upright, fashioned tools and developed communal living. Likely they even devised methods for calculating relative humidity in their own environments, but had the foresight to understand that humidity need not be exact, for exactness was impossible.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JoshSloane For This Useful Post:

    M.P.C (04-16-2015),Morganaberkana (04-16-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1