Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 612

0 members and 612 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,105
Posts: 2,572,114
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: why? WHY??

  1. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-25-2015
    Posts
    33
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: why? WHY??

    BPSnakelady yes that's exactly what I'm thinking

    probably it's this scenting territory for feeling more comfortable...what i don't understand is that it doesn't fit to the whole idea of cleaning/changing tubs for problem feeders. if the tub represents a new snake-free hide, then the snake should wait for the rodent without producing odours that could warn the rodent, then eat it and poo/pee before searching for another hide. Does the idea and my english make any sense?

    i'm sorry but i don't change it immediately...i recently changed to corrugated paper which absorbs a lot and dries in a couple of hours. if they poop i will.
    Last edited by rubberduck; 04-08-2015 at 06:21 PM.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rubberduck For This Useful Post:

    BPSnakeLady (04-08-2015),Citrus (04-09-2015)

  3. #12
    BPnet Lifer Albert Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-22-2015
    Location
    Spotsylvania, Va.
    Posts
    4,651
    Thanks
    6,518
    Thanked 3,295 Times in 2,139 Posts
    Images: 39

    Smile Re: why? WHY??

    Garter snakes are notorious for this! Trust me, they are the species that does it routinely! Lol. Yes, I think scent marking new territory has a part in it.

  4. #13
    BPnet Lifer Skiploder's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-03-2007
    Location
    Under a pile of wood.
    Posts
    3,580
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 3,727 Times in 1,257 Posts
    Images: 1
    Studies outlined in the book "The Health and Welfare of Captive Reptiles" looks in depth at this behavior. It is noted in not only snakes, but lizards. There are several reasons why this happens.

    In the studies, the defecation was wholly dependent on the whether soiled objects were left in the enclosure or whether it was completely and thoroughly cleaned. The latency and frequency of defecation was noted and was found to be related to an absence of chemical cues. It occurred equally in new acquisitions and in long term captives.

    If small soiled stones or bits of bedding were left in the enclosures, no defecation behavior was noted. In other words, the behavior can be mitigated by leaving familiar scent clues in the cage.

    The conclusions pointed at several behavioral culprits:

    (1) For a lack of a better word, scent marking.

    (2) Increased metabolic activity due to measured increases in cortisol levels due to the combined stresses of unfamiliar scents and handling. Remember, even in habituated animals, measurable increases in cortisol levels were noted after even short handling sessions. Cortisol in humans is a believed aggravator of IBS.

    (3) "Emotional Fever". A phenomenon in which an animal has a fever response to handling. This means that some snakes would elevated their baseline temperatures by up to 6 degrees Celsius after handling sessions. The reason is unknown, but the behavior has been noted in snakes, lizards and even mammals.

    (4) There is a separate school of thought that deals with how snakes perceive their environment. The theory is that the cues left by cleaning agents rob the animal of it's ability to perceive the enclosure as home. They are unfamiliar and induce elevated stress levels. Researchers were able to curtail this behavior by making sure traces of novel scents were in the cages at all times. Therefore, once the odor was deemed as a natural part of their home, the defecation response to cleaning ceased.

    Keep in mind that these same set of studies showed that snakes can tell the difference between their own feces and those of conspecifics.

    In short, they look for familiar chemical cues. Whether this is to mark territory or is a process in which familiar scents are a function of their perception of the environment would probably depend on the species and the sex of the animal.

    If you don't like the behavior, acclimate the animal to the scent of your cleaner.

  5. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Skiploder For This Useful Post:

    ballpythonluvr (04-09-2015),Bluebonnet Herp (04-09-2015),Citrus (04-09-2015),Darkbird (04-09-2015),dr del (04-09-2015),Lizardlicks (04-11-2015),rubberduck (04-09-2015),T_Sauer (04-09-2015)

  6. #14
    BPnet Veteran BPSnakeLady's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-27-2014
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    416
    Thanks
    352
    Thanked 173 Times in 137 Posts
    Images: 4

    Re: why? WHY??

    Interesting.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    BPs - Lots
    Corn Snake - One.
    Retic

    Fuzzies
    Dog Cat Mice rats

    Offspring - 10 plus grand-offspring 0.0

  7. #15
    BPnet Veteran Daigga's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-20-2014
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    691
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 330 Times in 223 Posts
    Fascinating. I've always known the trick to getting aything to poo was to give their home a good and thorough cleaning, but never quite knew why. Kind of figured it was just a kind of "screw you" response, especially since I first learned that trick with my cats. Couldn't even leave a bag of litter open around them...

  8. #16
    Registered User Running Elk's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-07-2014
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    133
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 39 Times in 21 Posts

    Re: why? WHY??

    Quote Originally Posted by rubberduck View Post
    Why do they have to pee the moment i put them in a clean freshly lined cage?

    Is it standard practice? Is it like a genetically imprinted trait to punish us?

    Sorry for the rant. I love my snakes but i was rubbing for an hour! Do yours do that? What should i do?
    It could be worse. They could pee on you instead.

  9. #17
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    12-27-2014
    Posts
    497
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 212 Times in 134 Posts

    Re: why? WHY??

    Wow Skiploder this is really interesting. I wonder if thats why snakes are sometimes a little hesitant about new cage furniture.

    What kind of lizard species were mentioned?

  10. #18
    BPnet Lifer Skiploder's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-03-2007
    Location
    Under a pile of wood.
    Posts
    3,580
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 3,727 Times in 1,257 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: why? WHY??

    Quote Originally Posted by Jhill001 View Post
    Wow Skiploder this is really interesting. I wonder if thats why snakes are sometimes a little hesitant about new cage furniture.

    What kind of lizard species were mentioned?
    Phrynosoma Cornutum (Texas Horned Lizards) were specifically mentioned,

    References were made to other studies involving other species.

    Something to keep in mind...

    The stress of acclimation - specifically introducing a captive snake to a new environment - has been observed to last an average of 21 days. Again, this stress is quantified by measuring cortisol levels in the animal.

    Presumably, that 21 days is how long it takes for the snake to accept spatial and chemical cues and, for lack of a better term. "make peace" with them.

    When you clean an enclosure, you may alter both cues that the animal used to acclimate itself to it's "home". You may remove all of the chemical cues by cleaning and if you rearrange or replace the furniture you alter the spatial ones.

    You introduce new chemical cues that are transient and which the snake never really adapts to (the scent of the cleaner).

    As with any husbandry operation, the key is to make things as stress free as possible. If you use a cleaner like F10, even using it for spot cleaning may not give the animal enough time to register it as a chemical cue that's part of their environment. The experiments showed that if you kept something with a trace of that chemical clue in the enclosure for a period of time, the cleaner would not induce a defecation response.

    None of this is new. Many of these studies go back to the 1970s.

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Skiploder For This Useful Post:

    AmandaJ (04-09-2015),Darkbird (04-09-2015),rubberduck (04-09-2015)

  12. #19
    BPnet Senior Member artgecko's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-07-2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,699
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 792 Times in 517 Posts
    Huh.. Interesting information. I will have to consider this the next time I clean tubs.
    Currently keeping:
    1.0 BCA 1.0 BCI
    1.0 CA BCI 1.1 BCLs
    0.1 BRB 1.2 KSBs
    1.0 Carpet 0.5 BPs
    0.2 cresteds 1.2 gargs
    1.0 Leachie 0.0.1 BTS

  13. #20
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    12-27-2014
    Posts
    497
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 212 Times in 134 Posts

    Re: why? WHY??

    I'd have read the study if the book wasn't 180 bucks or 120 for a dang E-book. I wonder if these people ever thought about lowering these things to like 40 bucks how many people would actually buy them. Especially for a book published 13-14 years ago.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1