Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 568

0 members and 568 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,069
Threads: 249,219
Posts: 2,572,797
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, ColorblindChameleon
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Threaded View

  1. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-25-2010
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
    There is a lot of genetic stuff that seems to slip past most in the herp world. Incomplete vs CoDominance is one of them. There is no mention of incomplete dominance at all in the reptile world. With the multitude of morphs, it would be another never ending discussion about which are incomplete vs codom, so we have to accept that codom is the term.

    Another stumbling block is that people prove the "codoms" before they prove "super" forms. Therefore, a Mojave is "het for BEL", which is a more accurate description than "mojave". (I have to qualify the last statement as I suck at visually identifying some of the single allele forms of codoms. Some mojos that proved out just looked like abnormal normals to me)

    Just don't get frustrated. Many times, people ARE serious about their "het for Mojave". Do your best to nudge them to the science, but remember the old adage about leading a horse to water....

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to kaitala For This Useful Post:

    Masonic (12-26-2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1