Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 735

0 members and 735 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,105
Posts: 2,572,111
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 107

Threaded View

  1. #10
    BPnet Veteran omnibus2's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-10-2009
    Posts
    318
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Another pitbull kills, this time a little girl

    Quote Originally Posted by PitOnTheProwl View Post
    There are plenty of cities that infringe on my rights to allow you yours.
    You cannot pick what you want regulated and then choose not to regulate another part of it.
    Before this gets sent to QT for people stirring the pot, let me ask you this:
    Can you prove to me it was a true APBT?

    130#, I call media bull!! The term pitbull is just plain money for the media and the sheep that follow.
    I would appreciate it if you had read my previous responses.VVVV
    Quote Originally Posted by omnibus2 View Post
    But they are dangerous animals. It scares me how some people-not necessarily you-refuse to accept this.
    For example, I accept that reticulated pythons are dangerous animals. I am not stupid, nor am I ignorant. I listen to the facts and the biology. I also know that pitbulls are dangerous. This doesn't mean you can't love your python or pitbull! It just means that just like any potentially dangerous animal, there need to be regulations-perhaps a license and a competency test.

    Don't you agree with that? That way we can prevent idiots from buying and mishandling pitbulls and pythons-because if they do, things like this happen and you get a bad rap! And that leads to a full ban! Just like tigers and lions-should everyone and anyone be able to buy a lion, a tiger, or even, a gabon viper? No, that's silly. Only people who prove they are able to handle these animals should.
    Not once did I pick and choose like you accuse me of. I am asking for an equal treatment of all potentially dangerous animals-be it tigers, reticulated pythons, or dogs.


    Can you prove to me it was a true APBT?
    All of the media outlets say that it was a pitbull. But no, I guess I can't prove 100% with empirical evidence that it was a pitbull. Just like we can't prove that those giant snakes were actually anacondas or burmese pythons. Also see the following:
    Quote Originally Posted by omnibus2 View Post
    Thank you for bringing this to my attention as it is a valid point. Then, perhaps, whichever dog encompasses the "pitbull" should be regulated-whichever mix of breeds these are, that have been recorded attacking people, should be regulated.

    There are plenty of cities that infringe on my rights to allow you yours.
    I would appreciate seeing any examples.

    I do not see why this needs to be moved to the QT, as we are having legitimate, respectful discussions. Nevertheless you are the moderator and it's up to you. I personally look forward to discussing this issue with fellow forum members as most people here appear to be smart, reasonable people who love their pets-just like I do.
    Last edited by omnibus2; 03-27-2014 at 07:23 PM.
    For every 15-foot python out in the Everglades, there are thousands of species of clams, trees, cats, grasses and birds that are wrecking just as much havoc across the globe. So, for all the headaches the snakes are causing, I at least applaud them for being scary enough to get people's attention.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to omnibus2 For This Useful Post:

    STjepkes (04-04-2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1