» Site Navigation
0 members and 550 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,189
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
|
-
Re: Caramel VS Ultramel
 Originally Posted by Badgemash
Crider is a recessive gene that looks nearly identical to ultramel, and up until recently most people thought they were just two names for the same thing or two allelic but compatible genes (like coral glow/banana or butter/lesser), but it looks like they are actually not compatible with each other (like the separate axanthic lines) .... (shortened)...
thats really interesting.
but then: why not still go for it? as long as you know what you have, whats the problem with working with a smaller line that does the same things, if its so much cheaper? like with axanthic, different people work with different lines, and working with a smaller line is fine and its about the resulting optics. and people argue which lines of axanthic look the best. and for each line, there are people working with it.
so, even if they look almost the same but are incompatible (i am not sure yet, there does not seem to be much solid data), why not still go for it?
and now back to the (less popular) caramel: ok it has issues. and so has the caramillo, because its both ultramel and caramel. but the caramillo looks awesome. if it would not be for the issues with caramel, the caramillo would still be a rather unusual double recessive project, but the issues call it into question. now if crider has no issues, why not attempt a double recessive crider + ultramel? that would not be for everyone because it would probarbly look like candino or lavender albino or something, just with different genetics. but still, the option is there, so if you, by accident, produce a clutch of double hets instead of visuals, it would not be all that bad. you could still get them sold to others that may want to try ultramel + crider, or go for it yourself. but then there is the still real possibility that they are compatible, or even the same, after all. in which case, no problem at all.
now you need to see if you can verify which one it really is, ultramel or crider, and if its crider you need to figure out if maybe you want it anyway.
and then, just to make things more complicated, i need to throw in / randomly mention monarch:
http://www.worldofballpythons.com/morphs/monarch/ <--- can someone explain what im looking at?
its really a lazy attempt to 1up the game and turn the caramel vs ultramel thread, which has already turned into a caramel vs ultramel vs crider thread, into a caramel vs ultramel vs crider vs monarch thread. if that makes sense
The Big Bang almost certainly (beyond reasonable doubt) happened 13.7 billion years ago. If you disagree, send me a PM.
Evolution is a fact, evolutionary theory explains why it happens and provides four different lines of evidence that coalesce to show that evolution is a fact. If you disagree, send me a PM.
One third of the global economy relies on technology that is based on quantum mechanics, especially quantum electrodynamics (electron-photon or electron-electron interactions). If you disagree, send me a PM.
Time Dilation is real, it is so real that all clocks if they are precise enough can measure it, and GPS could not possibly work without it. If you disagree, send me a PM.
The 4 philosophically most important aspects of modern science are: Evolutionary theory, Cosmology, Quantum mechanics, and Einsteins theory of general relativity. Understand these to get a grip of reality.
my favorite music video is online again, its really nice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oABEGc8Dus0
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|