BHB gives info on some scaleless concerns

[OhhWatALoser]

It can technically be labeled as heterozygous for scaleless too. Like how pastel is Het for homozygous super pastel.....

Visual 'recessives' like Het clowns/pieds aren't called co-dom. Yet they show 'codom' traits.

Its all little technicalities.
And BP genetic labels are already inaccurate enough. Co-dominance isn't even the correct term either. Its incomplete dominance. Similar, but not the same......


Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

yeah, incomplete dominant is the more accurate term.

anyway, not recessive. its much too obvious for that. i mean, its missing scales right in the middle of the head.

So you mean incomplete dominant...

I believe you are all wrong, it IS co-dominant not inc-dom.

see my thread for explanation: http://ball-pythons.net/forums/showt...e-Co-Dom-morph


on topic, why are the heat pits still brought up? The thing eats, why are the heat pits an issue?