Quote Originally Posted by Dave Green View Post
If we dismissed all "normalish" looking dinkers we would have missed out on quite a few cool supers and combos.
Not dismiss. Like I said, just refer to them as het with markers, and define the super as a recessive morph, examples = het pied and het red axanthic. I'm just saying we don't need 500 "morphs" when 250 of them are barely discernible. We should save the cool names for the cool phenotypes, and call the hets what they are. If it's something that really stands out, like pastel or lesser, that's one thing. But I think something like disco which is essentially invisible to anyone other than the most experienced breeders should be called a het disco, whereas the super disco should be the disco morph and considered recessive rather than co-dominant. That's not dismissing, it's just cleaning up the ever-growing morph list and eliminating the clutter.