Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 686

0 members and 686 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,112
Posts: 2,572,157
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Threaded View

  1. #3
    BPnet Veteran Ball Clan's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-05-2012
    Location
    Little Rock, AR
    Posts
    540
    Thanks
    162
    Thanked 209 Times in 108 Posts
    Images: 4

    Re: Might be a new Morph

    Quote Originally Posted by BigIan View Post
    Not knocking it at all but a lot of these 'new' gene snakes seem to look really similar to a normal.

    What I want to know is around how often new super visible color/pattern gene snakes pop up. Things like GHI, Banana, Pied, Clown, etc...

    I know there's not a solid answer but on average maybe?

    Again, great looking snake
    It's true. There are a lot of new "co-dominant morphs" that I would scarcely or never recognize from a normal. Too many of them to name but play around with the big morph list on World of Ball Pythons and I don't think it'll take you long to get question marks above your head. I think a lot of them actually have a much more legitimate case for being called het for whatever the "super" form is, and the "super" be considered a recessive morph. Just have the subtle differences be accepted as genetic markers. We see it in the het pied and het red axanthic, so it's not like this doesn't happen already. To me, that would clean things up quite a bit. But that's just my 2 cents FWIW.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Ball Clan For This Useful Post:

    Flikky (10-22-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1