Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 2,086

1 members and 2,085 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

blueface (56)

» Stats

Members: 76,060
Threads: 249,212
Posts: 2,572,739
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, TillyMintz8613
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Threaded View

  1. #7
    BPnet Senior Member kitedemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-01-2010
    Location
    NS Canada
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked 1,795 Times in 1,391 Posts
    Images: 11

    Re: Cage Heating (Radiant Panel vs Belly Heat)

    Quote Originally Posted by norwegn113 View Post
    I state my case! Lol. The reason some people cant seem to get their panels to work the way they are supposed to , is that they mount the temp probe to the face of the panel and try to control the output temp of the panel to around 130 deg. That is the reason they are not getting satisfactory results. The panels were designed to run in the 170-190 range. Trying to control the output temps to 130 or lower renders them useless. But what do I know? Im just a guy that has 7 cages working flawlessly while some want to argue the relativity of nature lol. Best of luck my friend and please be careful of the bias views of some you find on this site. Just because they cant get theirs to work correctly doesn't mean the product doesnt work. Remember, its not about their egos, its about your animals health!!!
    I dangle mine personally an animal should NEVER EVER come between a probe and a heat source for long. It blocks the heat with its body and causes the t-stat to kick in to full gear. I used my specific temps as a example as that is what I have this month. 130º gives me 90º on the top most surface a snake can lay, and 94º on the most dorsal surface of the animal (if there were an animal in my test enclosure) I never want any of mine to have a relatively small area heated beyond this as it is the point where body function becomes effected.

    I just ask for simple fact. You claim they are more efficient, and yet they are higher wattage, and your example they lose up to 100ºF . I set uth to 91-2º and get basically 90º give or take half a degree here and there, for less power and lower purchase price. To my mind that is efficient. Unbiased opinion? Oxymoron. Opinions by nature are biased on experience. I use RHP in arboreal set ups they are super efficient this way, heat where and how you want it. I 100% recommend them this way as they were designed to be used. Terrestrial set ups I do not believe they are efficient or do what many claim, heat air. They cost more, lose more heat, (100º still blows me away) and need more power (in most cases 4x) to generate the same hot spot.

    I personally do not feel that a snake should be subjected to higher temps on a surface they can lay upon greater than 94ºF the animals safety is paramount. This in my case means I cannot get the 'floor' warmer than 88ºF with out compromising this basic principal. RHP heats down not up. So the nearest thing to the panel two inches over it (thickness of the snake) should never be allowed to be greater than 94ºF.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to kitedemon For This Useful Post:

    KMG (02-15-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1