Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 638

1 members and 637 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,114
Posts: 2,572,183
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Threaded View

  1. #6
    BPnet Lifer wolfy-hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-10-2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,505
    Thanks
    2,128
    Thanked 2,221 Times in 1,151 Posts
    Images: 23
    Perhaps they feed slightly larger food items every other week, and that way the snake gets the same calories. Ive seen sizable females that were fed every 3-4 weeks, kept at less than ideal temperatures, so the idea that if you don't feed once a week = sickly malnourished scrawny snakes is obviously wrong.

    I've been told by very successful breeders that they also attempt breeding younger females and I do believe that the female will not take if it's not mature enough. Until someone produces a study with a LOT of data showing that smaller/younger females have some bad reaction to being bred young/small, it's all conjecture. Yes, a female loses weight when they lay eggs, but in my experience many smaller(although not generally THAT small in my own snakes of course) pythons lay fewer eggs. As they got older, they seem to lay more eggs in a clutch. That's not based on a study with lots of data btw, it's just what I seem to have observed so far with mine.

    And referring to breeding(or attempting to induce breeding) in two snakes where one might be smaller than the "industry standard" being called 'rape' is ridiculous in so many ways that I'm not certain where to start. It's distasteful. A male snake can hardly force a female to breed with him, since it requires a bit of cooperation on her part too.

    Just because a lot of the hobby believes in doing things one way, doesn't automatically mean that other ways are "wrong" or "dangerous". After all, at one point folks only kept BPs in fish tanks with bare aspen, little to no humidity and heat lamps and unregulated heat rocks. Just because most of the hobby kept them that way, was it right too?
    Last edited by wolfy-hound; 11-25-2012 at 08:30 PM.
    Theresa Baker
    No Legs and More
    Florida, USA
    "Stop being a wimpy monkey,; bare some teeth, steal some food and fling poo with the alphas. "

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1