Quote Originally Posted by Skiploder View Post
That "study" has been discussed, dissected and essentially debunked. Much of the evidence was anecdotal, not directly related to bedding and rodents (but for example humans and sawmills) and several articles were soon written that dissected the claims point by point.

It's been covered numerous times on several forums. The article does nothing but highlight the folly of referencing shoddy and specious studies in order to make a point.
Do you have any copies of the articles? Much of it is (especially under the pine section), about mice. For examples, the figures were taken from
Odynets, A., O. Simonova, A. Kozhuhov, T. Saitsev, A. Verreva, L. Gnilomedova, and R. Rudzish. 1991. Beddings for laboratory animals: Criteria of Biological evaluation. Laboratornye Zhyvotnye 1:70-6.


Again, as I said it is older but I would be interested in reading newer articles contradicting this one.