Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 671

0 members and 671 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,191
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran Luke Martin's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-06-2008
    Location
    Baton Rouge, La
    Posts
    832
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 321 Times in 191 Posts
    I'll just start off by saying that I've been breeding balls for 10 years and am the BIGGEST skeptic when it comes to people having dinkers that they say are new morphs. You can ask most of the people I'm friends with in this business, and they'd all agree. I have to see solid proof that something is a genetically reproducible trait before I can say its a morph, which is why I've had them for so long and never released them, nor have a lot of people seen many. If I were looking for fame, I wouldn't be breeding ball pythons , nor would it have not been seen often.

    With that, I've reproduced Cupids almost every year that I've bred ball pythons. I've only had 7 eggs (2 from pastel cupid x cupid and 5 from pastel cupid x pastel cupid) to try and produce a super so far, so I can't say yes or no on that front as I could have easily missed. Or it could even be mixed into one of the pastels or supers I produced from one of those clutches. I'll know this year as all of the females from those clutches will be breeding this season. I've really had some great responses from people who have seen them in person. I knew I should have brought a few with me to Tinley, but I do plan on bringing some next time.

    The name started out as a joke because they have a little light spot on the head that looks like a heart, but between the people I talked to it about, the name kind of stuck. Its a genetically banding gene and tends to lighten things up...and they're MEAN! lol It's a bit subtle in the base form but the pastels and supers it really makes a fantastic looking snake. Into adulthood, the pastel versions tend to white out over browning out. It's one of those genes that really does need to be seen to be appreciated as Matthew mentioned. The Super Pastel version is neon yellow at 1200 grams, and looks even nicer than when she was born. I'll be breeding it into some other genes this year as I have a few extra females and am motivated to take it off of the back burner and do some cool things with it. I'm interested to see what it will do with genes other than pastel.

    I don't expect to make full believers out of everyone right away, and that's fine. There are morphs on WOBP that I'm not impressed with at all. Doesn't mean they aren't a genetically reproducible trait, and that's what WOBP is for. I have people wanting them, but I kind of doubt I even release any next year either. I'll have to see what comes from the breedings that happen this season.

    I'm open to any questions or criticisms about the project. Not everything is for everyone

    Here's a few pics with some comparisons and some better pictures of some.

    A younger Cupid from a few years back


    A young Pastel Cupid


    A clutch from Pewter x Cupid The top middle being a Pastel Cupid


    A clutch from Pastel Cupid x Normal...middle snake being a Pastel Cupid


    Bottom right Pastel Cupid, and Cupids in the top right


    A Pastel Cupid with a Cupid
    Last edited by Luke Martin; 10-16-2012 at 08:16 PM.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Luke Martin For This Useful Post:

    Andybill (10-17-2012),Annarose15 (10-16-2012),brobertson (10-16-2012),kdreptiles (10-16-2012)

  3. #12
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    07-04-2012
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    150
    Thanked 68 Times in 45 Posts
    Images: 1
    Thanks so much for this writeup! Love the 2nd and last pictures, very neat.


  4. #13
    Registered User .G&S Royal pythons.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2012
    Location
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    103
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
    Images: 9
    The pastel cupids look very similar to blonde pastels, i honestly thought i was looking at pics of my blonde project

  5. #14
    BPnet Veteran RobNJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-25-2011
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    1,852
    Thanks
    383
    Thanked 789 Times in 548 Posts

    Re: What do you all think of the "cupid" ball?

    Hey Luke, thanks for chiming in on the Cupid...would you be able to post a picture of a subadult/adult pastel cupid next to a pastel?

    Quote Originally Posted by angeluscorpion View Post
    Perhaps it's morph power is to make things sub-par. Perhaps this is the morph that has come along to knock all the other morphs down a peg a two lol.
    Classy...nothing like crapping on someone's project.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to RobNJ For This Useful Post:

    Andybill (10-17-2012)

  7. #15
    Sometimes It Hurts... PitOnTheProwl's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-21-2010
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    12,050
    Thanks
    6,313
    Thanked 6,985 Times in 4,274 Posts
    Images: 3
    This is the reason I wish WOBP would put descriptions with the morphs. They have a place for it, why not utalize it?
    This isnt directed just at Luke but also everyone that claims a new morph and wants it listed on WOBP.................
    I think the breeders need to step up and demand/provide "why" with their pics.
    There are so many new claims that look like normals in pictures or they look like an already existing morph BUT no reason why it has a different name given.

  8. #16
    Registered User angeluscorpion's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-20-2012
    Location
    San Clemente CA
    Posts
    313
    Thanks
    165
    Thanked 58 Times in 51 Posts

    Cool Re: What do you all think of the "cupid" ball?

    Quote Originally Posted by RobNJ View Post
    Hey Luke, thanks for chiming in on the Cupid...would you be able to post a picture of a subadult/adult pastel cupid next to a pastel?



    Classy...nothing like crapping on someone's project.
    Based on the pics I saw on WOBP they didnt make the morph look any better. I'm not crapping on his project, just stating what I thought about it just like the OP asked.
    0.2 Het Albino 1.0 Pinstripe
    0.1 Het Pied 1.0 Orangebelly
    0.1 Light Dinker 1.0 Dark Dinker
    0.1 Lemon Blast 1.0 Albino
    1.2Pastel 1.0 Lesser Pastel
    0.1 Spider. 1.0 Enchi

    "This is my face when I meet Zac Efron"

    Check us out: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stars-...51208821608542
    Check us out: http://www.youtube.com/user/starsstr...?feature=watch

  9. #17
    Registered User mustang91302's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-26-2012
    Location
    Slidell
    Posts
    147
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
    I really like the look of the pastel cupid. Very nice.

  10. #18
    BPnet Veteran Luke Martin's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-06-2008
    Location
    Baton Rouge, La
    Posts
    832
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 321 Times in 191 Posts

    Re: What do you all think of the "cupid" ball?

    Thanks guys, I can understand your point of being skeptical of it and not seeing what is in them. They're actually quite obvious in person, especially up against a normal. I'll be breeding a Lesser Fire to a few Cupid animals this year, so I'm interested to see how it reacts with some other genes.


    Quote Originally Posted by RobNJ View Post
    Hey Luke, thanks for chiming in on the Cupid...would you be able to post a picture of a subadult/adult pastel cupid next to a pastel?
    Thanks, I'll try and get some up soon. Works been pretty hectic so bare with me.



    Quote Originally Posted by PitOnTheProwl View Post
    This is the reason I wish WOBP would put descriptions with the morphs. They have a place for it, why not utalize it?
    This isnt directed just at Luke but also everyone that claims a new morph and wants it listed on WOBP.................
    I think the breeders need to step up and demand/provide "why" with their pics.
    There are so many new claims that look like normals in pictures or they look like an already existing morph BUT no reason why it has a different name given.
    I'd sent a description to Allan as well with the email I sent him. I understand he's very busy and it could have not been a well enough description for him to post up. I sent him pics of a Pastel Cupid as well but the pic wasn't what he was looking for, so I had to send him another and he hasn't gotten it up yet.

  11. #19
    BPnet Veteran cecilbturtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-27-2011
    Location
    Breinigsville PA
    Posts
    1,025
    Thanks
    385
    Thanked 333 Times in 215 Posts
    Images: 14
    If I missed it I do apologize, but could you put up some photos of cupids next to normals of the the same age/size please? I'm just not seeing it.
    "you only regret the risks in life you DON'T take."

  12. #20
    BPnet Lifer snakesRkewl's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-14-2009
    Location
    Milwaukie, Oregon
    Posts
    7,665
    Thanks
    2,687
    Thanked 3,036 Times in 2,147 Posts
    Images: 2
    Selectively breeding a banded snake to a pastel will make brighter pastels, but does that make the cupid a new morph or just another banded ball you're using to make nicer animals with
    Jerry Robertson

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1