Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 645

1 members and 644 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,199
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran Gloryhound's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-09-2008
    Location
    Coopersville, MI
    Posts
    1,389
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 146 Times in 98 Posts
    When you get into blood python sub adults and larger it changes to Pounds. I'm sure other large thick snakes also get measured in pounds.

    The 38 Lb Female I sold would have been 17236 grams. Granted since I don't have a gram scale that goes that high and I had to use the bathroom scale with me holding her any conversion to grams would have been a rough estimate that could have been off by 500 grams or so.

  2. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-07-2012
    Location
    Mountaineer Country
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Why weigh in grams?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gloryhound View Post
    When you get into blood python sub adults and larger it changes to Pounds. I'm sure other large thick snakes also get measured in pounds.

    The 38 Lb Female I sold would have been 17236 grams. .

    Or a 90150 gram Tiger Retic.

  3. #13
    Anti-Thread Necro Patrol
    Join Date
    05-10-2007
    Location
    Columbus, Georgia, United States
    Posts
    4,561
    Thanks
    334
    Thanked 1,230 Times in 739 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images: 51

    Re: Why weigh in grams?

    Quote Originally Posted by lovepig78 View Post
    Because decimals suck.

    imagine putting the weight of a 90g baby in pounds or ounces.....

    90 grams = 0.198 lbs or 3.174 ounces


    pffff
    This!

    This is also why we still use the old system for height and weight (mostly). It also sounds more impressive. It's easier and more impressive sounding to say I was 210 lbs than 95.254 kg. The same is true for saying I am 6' ft tall than 1.83 meters.
    Last edited by MasonC2K; 10-12-2012 at 02:56 PM.
    - Mason

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1