Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 833

0 members and 833 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,171
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Threaded View

  1. #22
    BPnet Veteran AGoldReptiles's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-30-2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    220
    Thanked 101 Times in 76 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Deborah View Post
    OB are still jut a different line of YB regardless.

    At the time I talked to Ben (who started the project) his theory on the additional gene was that it was a recessive gene attached to the OB, the Ultra in his opinion at the time was and Ivory carrying that specific gene. In other words his thought at the time that

    OB Het? X OB Het? = Make graphite and ultras (ultras being ivory het?), at the time more breeding needed to be done to confirmed this and I am not sure where he stands now.

    As for OB X YB producing Graphite does not prove it's not recessive the YB could have very well carry the gene as well.

    Just like not all OB to OB pairing make Ultras or Graphite hence the additional gene.
    I know who started the OB as I bought mine from Ben

    It is obvious that there is another gene at play to make the Ultras and Graphites. I just don't think it is recessive. If the YB in a OB x YB that makes a Graphite was in fact a " Het." then why do we not have Ultras and Graphites popping up in YB x YB clutchs? Surely someone one get lucky and line up unknown "Hets." if this were the case.

    Another reason that I don't believe it to be a recessive trait is that non ultra Ivories from the OB line have later produced Graphites. So if they were " Hets." shouldn't they have been at least Ultras ?

    Either it is still unknown what is going on with this gene or If someone has it figured out they haven't posted what those findings are that I have seen.

    I wouldn't go writing OB off as nothing more than a YB. They are compatible and OB's can do anything a YB can do, but YB's can't do all that an OB can do. And we have just scratched the surface with this gene. Again I think we will see big things down the road from the OB, but that's just my opinion
    Selective Buying + Selective Breeding = Select Results!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to AGoldReptiles For This Useful Post:

    angeluscorpion (09-19-2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1