Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 741

1 members and 740 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,172
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 63

Threaded View

  1. #27
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    01-04-2011
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    865
    Thanks
    165
    Thanked 165 Times in 130 Posts

    Re: Possible super pinstripes

    Quote Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser View Post
    right here http://ball-pythons.net/forums/showt...s-Spider-Morph the thread where you had most of this information presented to you.

    trying to prove out a homozygous pin and failing would be your evidence, which I dont see. lack of evidence is not evidence, especially when there is no evidence of even trying.

    So with nothing left, you insult me. I love the internet

    - - - Updated - - -



    vin russo already stated his congo female only produces congos, so yes this is correct.
    LOL, so you repeated the same thing I was saying and then presented me with information that I already know and then claim that your answering questions for me, hows that work?WOW! Also it appears that you are going against your own current arguement in that thread. All over the place again. Do you believe everything people post and what you read on the net?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser View Post
    All I can say really is wow. Evidence pointing in two different directions now, always interesting. thanks for the link.

    - - - Updated - - -



    I've explain bhb 1-023i492309854i times now, so I dont know what the problem is. you want a picture? https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...A-nd0QG-voCoAg looks something like that. if you cant trust the guy giving the information, thats your choice. it was proven though, you just don't believe it.
    talk to vin russo about his import congo, I would give you the link to the story, but he revamped his website. but you probably wouldn't believe him either.
    and unless the current model of genetics needs rewritting, the fact that a platty x platty produced a het daddy looking animal is proof.

    if a homo form is lethal, its not dominant, end of story. Spiders are dominant because theres no proven homozygous, or what i would call unproven dominant. if the homozygous spider is lethal, it will no longer be called dominant.
    This link is what you consider and take as evidence, LOL. Now I seriously question everything you say. Sounds to me like you cherry pick the things you want to be true and disregard everything else to the contrary of what you want to believe. Very scientific of you.
    Last edited by Domepiece; 09-11-2012 at 12:59 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1